Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. Scriven's Personal Property et al
as 5:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scriven's Personal Property, A Raven Arms P25 Pistol and Nine (9) Rounds Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
United States of America v. Fuller's Personal Property et al
as 5:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fuller's Personal Property, A RAVEN ARMS .25 CALIBER PISTOL, A WEATHERBY VANGUARD RIFLE and others
Claimant:
Wesley Russell Fuller
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Williams Personal Property, et al
as 4:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Williams Personal Property Specifically, Nineteen (19) Rounds of .40 Caliber Ammunition, Five (5) Rounds of .357 Caliber Ammunition and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Forfeiture Property - Firearm
USA v. Excam GT27, .25 caliber pistol, et al
as 5:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Excam GT27, .25 caliber pistol, serial number M68715, Assorted Caliber Ammunition, Ruger P89, 9mm pistol, serial number 305-80833 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. Kornegay Personal Property
as 5:2011cv00532
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Kornegay Personal Property Specifically Described as A Norinco Rifle, TWENTY-FOUR (24) COUNT WOLF, A RAVEN ARMS HANDGUN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Peredia-Montes Personal Property, Specifically a Remington 870 Shotgun, Serial Number A446590M et al
as 5:2008cv00265
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Peredia-Montes Personal Property, Specifically a Remington 870 Shotgun, Serial Number A446590M, A Savage Model Rifle, Serial Number E66583, A Raven .25 Caliber Handgun, Serial Number 1547716 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
