Cases 91 - 100 of 357
Kotkoswki v. Commerce Insurance et al
as 1:2019cv03141
Defendant:
Roosevelt Clark, Kayla Brown and Commerce Insurance
Plaintiff:
Paul Kotkoswki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kotkowski v. Commerce Insurance et al
as 1:2019cv03142
Defendant:
Roosevelt Clark, Kayla Brown and Commerce Insurance
Plaintiff:
Paul Kotkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley v. Drybola et al
as 1:2019cv03099
Defendant:
Earl Clark, S. House, D. Drybola and others
Plaintiff:
Daytron L. Mobley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2019cv03166
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, RNP, Dr. Arresahegn Getachen, M.D., Terri Prior, RNP and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. James A. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DuPreez et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv02974
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Debra DuPreez, et al.,, Jay Wilson, Antoine Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Robinson v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv02997
Plaintiff:
Tommy Robinson
Defendant:
Janette Clark and Frank B. Bishop, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Travis v. NBCI
as 1:2019cv02930
Defendant:
NBCI
Plaintiff:
Terry Travis and Anthony Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thompson et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02884
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thompson and Clark Thompson
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart-El v. Berry et al
as 8:2019cv02823
Defendant:
Troy D. Berry, John A. Riffle, Jerome R. Spenser and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Adel Stewart-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sirleaf v. Clarke et al
as 8:2019cv02379
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Captain Wright, D.Y. Kinsley and others
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
