Cases 101 - 110 of 1,268
Hubbard v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Maurice Antione Hubbard
Respondent:
USA and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casper v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Casper, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangus v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Mangus
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, Joseph Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
William Wesley Mace, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puller v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Toccara Yvonne Puller
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salahuddin v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Virginia Parole Board et al.
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Deshea Stone
Defendant:
Virginia Parole Board et al. and Harold W Clarke, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schiccatano v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Samuel Harry Schiccatano
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butts-Bey v. Schaefer et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts-Bey and ex rel Corey Lee Butts
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Dara Watson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
