Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Davis v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Courtney Davis
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clayton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Clayton
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jefferson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00032
Defendant:
Wanda Jefferson, Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Calandra A. Smith
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PARKER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Gena Parker
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Bethea v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Davie Bethea
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alexander Ramirez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
RAMIREZ ALEXANDER and Alexander Ramirez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barefoot v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Kristen Barefoot
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
