Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Steven Sodipo v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-2089
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN ABIODUN SODIPO
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Abu Ala Badruddoza v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-2007
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABU ALA MD BADRUDDOZA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Balsam Mountain Investments v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-2010
Petitioner - Appellant:
BALSAM MOUNTAIN INVESTMENTS, LLC, f/k/a Balsam Mountain Company, LLC, f/k/a Tax Matters Partner and BALSAM MOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Chadwick Myers v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-1967
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHADWICK DAVID MYERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Jesse Yates, III v. IRS
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE G. YATES, III
Plaintiff:
MELISSA LONG YATES
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
K. Dipal Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-1571
Petitioner - Appellant:
K. DIPAL ENTERPRISES, INC.
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Paresh Shah v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-1566
Petitioner - Appellant:
PARESH M. SHAH and RITA P. SHAH
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Jackie Robinson v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-1380
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACKIE H. ROBINSON, Administrator, Estate of Lolita I. Robinson, Deceased
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Catandria Soublet v. Commissioner of IRS
as 15-1382
Petitioner - Appellant:
CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Yates et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Yates
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
