Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Osborne v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Osborne, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heard v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Henry V. Heard
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Evans v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Shayna Evans
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Voss v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Voss
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Elsie Sue Brown
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garvey v. Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan Garvey
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tedesco v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
James Tedesco
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bernard v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Bernard
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hartman v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lanum Hartman
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ben-Avi v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Tyrell L.S. Ben-Avi
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
