Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 71
National Veterans Legal Svc v. DOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1435
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS B. MODLY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Navy, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, BARBARA M. BARRETT, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM
Christopher Chin-Young v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1176
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER CHIN-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee: KATHLEEN D. COLE, ASHTON B. CARTER, DOD Secretary, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Louis Tutt, III v. Ryan McCarthy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2480
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOUIS M. TUTT, III
Defendant / Appellee: RYAN D. MCCARTHY, Acting Secretary of the Army and RYAN D. MCCARTHY, Secretary of the Army
Walton Campbell v. Mark Esper
as 19-2395
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTON CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, Secretary of the Army
SourceAmerica v. United States Department of Ed
as 19-1514
Defendant / Appellant: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ELISABETH DEVOS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOURCEAMERICA and LAKEVIEW CENTER, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF KANSAS, BY AND THROUGH THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
State of Kansas v. SourceAmerica We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1452
Defendant: PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, ELISABETH DEVOS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SOURCEAMERICA and LAKEVIEW CENTER, INC.
Not Yet Classified: STATE OF KANSAS, BY AND THROUGH THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Irina Farquhar v. Mark Esper We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1406
Plaintiff / Appellant: IRINA VICTORIA FARQUHAR
Defendant: DEBRA LEE, Director of PEO EIS Human Resources, VICTOR HERNANDEZ, Chief, Program Management Directorate, MADHUSUDAN B. GOHIL, Chief, Performance Evaluation Division, CLPID and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army
Georgia Vocational v. US
as 19-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee: GEORGIA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM and MICHAEL C. LEE
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through Honorable James N. Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Honorable Mark Thomas Esper, Secretary of the Army, and Contracting Officer (Attention: Rhoda C. Harrison-Spence) for Army Solicitation No. W911SF-18-R-0001
Undetermined: SCOTT-GRACE MANAGEMENT
SC Coastal Conservation v. Andrew Wheeler
as 19-1136
Undetermined: NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, U.S. POULTRY AND EGG ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION, FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RYAN FISHER, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
City of New York v. DOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1699
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Navy, DR. MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF NEW YORK and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?