Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Ray v. Farris et al
as 8:2018cv00942
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ray
Defendant:
T. Erdos, Fredick, Hefiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Zack et al
as 1:2018cv00715
Plaintiff:
Patrick Riley
Defendant:
Albert R. Zack, III and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horn v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv03633
Plaintiff:
Riley Ernest Horn
Defendant:
State of Maryland, John C. Wobensmith, District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connor-Lopez et al v. Aerco International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03596
Plaintiff:
Lynda Connor-Lopez, Gail Rochester, Angelina Marie Chapman and others
Defendant:
Aerco, International, Inc. , Alfa Laval Inc. , Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane, Inc. , Industrial Holdings Corporation , The Nash Engineering Company and others
Cross_defendant:
John Crane, Inc. , 3M Company, Aerco, International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley v. USA-2255
as 1:2017cv03217
Petitioner:
Damien Riley
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Riley v. Stewart et al
as 1:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Riley
Defendant:
Mrs. Hamilton, Mrs. Foote, Mrs. Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yanes v. Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
Carlos Yanes
Defendant:
Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC and Edward Riley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yanes v. Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
Carlos Yanes
Defendant:
Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC and Edward Riley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowie v. Littrell et al
as 1:2016cv00849
Plaintiff:
Montrell Denard Bowie
Defendant:
Dave Littrell and Mary Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. NationStar Mortgage LLC
as 8:2015cv01909
Plaintiff:
Brigitte Riley
Defendant:
NationStar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
