Cases 41 - 50 of 1,636
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
el Sawahli et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Ali Abdul Rahman el Sawahli, Ahmad Ali el Sawahli, Tatyana Mouhamedovna Dakroub and others
Defendant:
Ted H. Kim, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall v. Powell
as 2:2024cv00351
Defendant:
Michele H. Powell
Plaintiff:
Shelby Hall
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Padilla v. Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Et. N. of TX; Dallas Division, Greg Abbott and Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse
Plaintiff:
Antonio H Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
