Cases 41 - 50 of 137
May v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP #1243
as 4:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Judy Carol May
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP #1243 doing business as Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITNEY, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 3:2021cv00394
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WHITNEY, MAI ABDELAZIZ, VICTORIA BACKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mays v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alan R. Mays and Alan R. Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maher v. Thompson et al
as 7:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Richard Chase Maher
Defendant:
Benjamen Thompson, John Doe Mays, CVRJ Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goins v. Unit Manager Miller et al
as 7:2021cv00087
Defendant:
F. Duty, John Doe #1, Correctional Officer Mays and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv00715
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Peng Lin, Kevin Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Thomas v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Investigator Mays, Chief Parker, Lt. Holden and others
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Lamar Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Leabough et al
as 3:2020cv00993
Defendant:
Officer Marshall, Lt. Smith, Sgt. Michael Plutro and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Sgt. Ms. Dial, A. David Robinson, Daniel McGowan and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellison v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Dena May Kellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
