Cases 41 - 50 of 574,369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Delaney v. Evolent Health LLC
as 1:2024cv01668
Defendant:
Evolent Health LLC
Plaintiff:
Kyeisha Delaney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Stevens-Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01658
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lolita L. Stevens-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ashoory et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
Mansoor Ashoory and Maryam Dadashzadeh
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UR M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martin v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00648
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Emory Martin, IV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
