Cases 61 - 70 of 694
Colvin v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Dantonio Colvin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Tompkins v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tompkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DOLS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
MERIEL DOLS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Green v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Darnell Green
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DURHAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Dale v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Tammy Dale
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Amelia Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bicksler v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Eric Bicksler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BOWDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Bowden
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r S KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
