Cases 81 - 90 of 1,901
Bowman v. Keen Mountain
as 7:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bowman
Defendant:
Keen Mountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Lee v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
David J. Lee
Defendant:
Deputy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Mullins et al
as 7:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Benny Mullins, Joseph Ely, Jonathan Carico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foran v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Darius Lee Foran, Sr.
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butts v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNair v. Publication Review Commitee
as 7:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Evan Lee McNair
Defendant:
Publication Review Commitee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malvo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Malvo
Defendant:
Director Harold Clarke, Warden Rick White, Major C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Myungjin Jung
Defendant:
Sang Keon Lee, Chan Hee Edward Lee and Vincent Jiwoo Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Novia v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Novia
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
