Cases 81 - 90 of 4,546
Truman v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Ari N. Truman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DeCarlos v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Kelley DeCarlos and DeCarlos Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mattocks v. USA
as 1:2023cv01801
Petitioner:
Abdullah Mattocks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Price v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Mary Kate Price
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mason v. USA
as 3:2023cv00865
Petitioner:
Omari Mason
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Stallings v. USA
as 6:2023cv81545
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Stallings
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. USA
as 3:2023cv00857
Petitioner:
Titus Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ramey-Woodard v. USA
as 7:2023cv81544
Petitioner:
William Preston Ramey-Woodard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matthews v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Renae Matthews
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
