Cases 1 - 10 of 1,594
el Sawahli et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Ali Abdul Rahman el Sawahli, Tatyana Mouhamedovna Dakroub, Nour Ali el Sawahli and others
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of USCIS UR M. Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hall v. Powell
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Shelby Hall
Defendant:
Michele H. Powell
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Padilla v. Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse et al
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Antonio H Padilla
Defendant:
Judicial District Court Dallas Co. Courthouse, U.S. Dist. Et. N. of TX; Dallas Division and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
