Cases 1 - 10 of 1,204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ong v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Petitioner:
Lye Huat Ong
Respondent:
David Greene and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
G.T.L., Msp. Trooper D, Sgt. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01028
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Respondent:
Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darling v. Webber et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Petitioner:
Deshaune D. Darling
Respondent:
Webber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNair v. Abello et al
as 1:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Michael McNair
Respondent:
Frederick Abello and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy v. Hakim et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Petitioner:
Terance A Tracy
Respondent:
Kakia Hakim and Attorney General for Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Warden of W.C.I. et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Petitioner:
Darrius Jordan
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
