Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Copley et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv05893
Plaintiff:
Lori Copley and Angela Copley
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beecham v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv23677
Plaintiff:
Carole R. Beecham
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. SmithKlein Beecham Corporation
as 3:2012cv01874
Plaintiff:
Betty Lane
Defendant:
SmithKlein Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whisman v. SmithKlein Beecham Corporation
as 3:2012cv01873
Plaintiff:
Terry Whisman
Defendant:
SmithKlein Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfost v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pfost
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00774
Plaintiff:
James Prince
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00772
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Gibson
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2011cv00754
Plaintiff:
Paul Meade
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00752
Plaintiff:
Marsha Chapman
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sikes v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, et al
as 1:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Hollis Sikes and Mary Sikes
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
