Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Bishop of Charleston v. Marcia Adams
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Intervenor Defendant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Bishop of Charleston v. Orangeburg County
as 21-1912
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Bishop of Charleston et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv01093
Plaintiff:
Bishop of Charleston a Corporation Sole doing business as The Roman Catholic Dioces of Charleston and South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities Inc
Defendant:
Marcia Adams, Henry McMaster and Brian Gaines
Amicus Curiae:
South Carolina Association of Christian Schools for Excellence, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
