Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cady et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06407
Plaintiff:
Charlene M. Cady and Dale L. Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Baron et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv05858
Plaintiff:
Maria Baron , Rosa Maria Ramirez , Zona Locklear and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28344
Plaintiff:
Desiree Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22175
Plaintiff:
Connie Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cady et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv12284
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cady and Ray Cady
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cady v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25453
Plaintiff:
Judy Cady
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21897
Plaintiff:
Melissa Rosales , Lisa Athans , William David Athans and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cady v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv20107
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cady
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cady et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv15116
Plaintiff:
Colleen Cady and Raymond Cady
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cadie et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cadie and Adam Cadie
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
