Cases 1 - 10 of 3,538
Francis v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cecil D. Francis
Defendant:
Doctor Mullens, Medical Staff Jane Doe or John Doe, Jane Doe or John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a U.S. Bank Equipment Finance v. Road Range Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
Defendant:
Road Range Express, Inc. and Sukhbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas v. Watson et al.
as 1:2024cv00991
Defendant:
Jamal L. Thomas, Ms. D. Watson, St. Brides Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Watson et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jamal L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ms. D. Watson and St. Brides Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wysinger v. Bryson et al
as 7:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kendall D. Wysinger
Defendant:
Mr. S. Bryson and Warden Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash et al v Ward
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Ash
Defendant:
Richard D. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
