Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bingham v. Dotson et al
as 1:2024cv01801
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson and David E. Anderson
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Younce et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, J. F. Harman, R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dozier, Ashaun Ra and Ashann- Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2024cv01225
Respondent:
David E. Anderson
Petitioner:
Ta'Kuan Keontay Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00406
Defendant:
Intel Officer R. Hickman, Intel Officer J.F. Harmon, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Ashan Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Anderson
as 7:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams and Michael Antoine Williams
Defendant:
David E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan K Bingham
Defendant:
David E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alexander Csaky Chase
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Michael McBride, B.S. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
