Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES OTSTOTT, Lieutenant General, USA (Ret.), EUGENE R. FIDELL, Lieutenant Commander, USCG (Ret.), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense and others
Defendant:
CRAIG NOBLE, Dr., MACK D. KEEN, Senior Chief Consolidated Brig, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General and others
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, EX REL. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity
Movant:
RAY ELBERT PARKER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE ET AL., PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and others
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-1057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, EX REL. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity
Movant:
RAY ELBERT PARKER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE ET AL., PHYSICIAN HOSPITALS OF AMERICA and others
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II v. Sebelius
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Amicu:
Ray Elbert Parker, American Center for Law and Justice , Todd Akin and others
Movant:
Steven J. Willis , Eve Ellingwood, American Civil Rights Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
