Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02881
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Immigration: Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HARRIS v. ROGERS, et al.,
as 1:2026cv00653
Plaintiff:
TONY L. HARRIS-BEY
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, JAMES SECOR, III, DAVID CHURCHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro Hernandez et al v. Mullin et al
as 8:2026cv02712
Plaintiff:
Delia Patricia Castro Hernandez and Wuilian Antonio Argueta Pereira
Defendant:
Elizabeth Grant, Acting Director TODD L LYONS, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
MCLUCAS v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 5:2026cv00463
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MCLUCAS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
