Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Raja et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, BWW Law Group, LLC and Equity Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Mohammad Raja v. MERSCORP Inc.
as 16-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ RAJA and NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., now known as Black Knight Infoserv, LLC and others
Raja et al v. MERSCOROP, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01663
Plaintiff:
M. Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja
Defendant:
MERSCOROP, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc, Lender Processing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mohammad Raja v. MERSCORP Inc.
as 14-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ RAJA and NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP INC., MERS-1, MERS-2, & MERS-3, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC., ("LPS") and others
Raja et al v. Merscorp, Inc., MERS-1, MERS-2, & MERS-3 et al
as 1:2013cv00944
Plaintiff:
M. Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja
Defendant:
Merscorp, Inc., MERS-1, MERS-2, & MERS-3, Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc, Lender Processing Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
M. Raja v. Segan, Mason & Mason, PC
as 13-1811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ RAJA and NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA
Defendant - Appellee:
SEGAN, MASON & MASON, PC, AIMEE THERESE HAY KESSLER, ANDREW P. HILL and others
Raja et al v. Segan, Mason & Mason, PC et al
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
M Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja
Defendant:
Segan, Mason & Mason, PC , Aimee T.H. Kessler , Andrew P. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.