Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Garcia v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03943
Plaintiff:
Nelly Garcia
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cleland v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02927
Plaintiff:
Nellie Cleland
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massingill v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00911
Plaintiff:
Nellie Massingill
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv08774
Plaintiff:
Nellie Coleman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv08014
Plaintiff:
Nellie Mathis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Croy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07405
Plaintiff:
Nellie Croy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonilla v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06310
Plaintiff:
Nelly Bonilla
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleisher v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03380
Plaintiff:
Nellie Fleisher
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lorenzana et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01702
Plaintiff:
Nelly Lorenzana and Alfredo Lorenzana
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
