Cases 1 - 10 of 2,310
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01663
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Geer v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Geer
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
Dwayne Douglas
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vaughan v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
Warden Keith Arnold, Asst Warden Bethany Cornchia, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fooks, Jr v. Warden of Patuxent et al
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Anton Fooks, Jr
Defendant:
Warden of Patuxent and Corizen Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Warden of W.C.I. et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Petitioner:
Darrius Jordan
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
