Cases 1 - 10 of 534
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Benny et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Javaun Johnson
Defendant:
A. Benny and Jason Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luma v. Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
as 1:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Honson Luma
Defendant:
Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
Petitioner:
Adam Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Williams, White, Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Collins, Williams, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
