Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saquing v. Mallett
as 23-60031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Milton Saquing
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeworski Mallett, Acting Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Gloria Perry, Medical Director, Mississippi Department of Corrections, One Unnamed Physician, Medical Doctor and others
Ricky Gipson v. Tim Wilkinson, et al
as 15-30682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM WILKINSON, VIRGIL LUCAS, TOMMY GLOVER and others
Ricky Gipson v. Tim Wilkinson, et al
as 13-30825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM WILKINSON, VIRGIL LUCAS, TOMMY GLOVER and others
Tommy White, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY WHITE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD KING, BYRON BRELAND and others
Willie Brown v. Latisha Johnson, et al
as 12-60179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
LATISHA JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, RON KING, Superintendent and others
Virgil v. Copiah Cty Shrf Dept, et al
as 08-60662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G VIRGIL
Defendant - Appellee:
COPIAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF HAZLEHURST POLICE DEPARTMENT, SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI NARCOTICS UNIT and others
Virgil v. Copiah Cty Shrf Dept, et al
as 08-60275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G VIRGIL
Defendant - Appellee:
COPIAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF HAZLEHURST POLICE DEPARTMENT, SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI NARCOTICS UNIT and others
Virgil v. Copiah Cty Shrfs, et al
as 08-60090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G VIRGIL
Defendant - Appellee:
COPIAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MILTON TWINER, JERRY SPEELL and others
Miller v. Wathen, et al
as 07-11099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN MILTON MILLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD E WATHEN, Warden, DANNY HORTON, Warden, JAMES D MOONEYHAM, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
