Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-20457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-20457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandra Curley, et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 15-30680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA CURLEY and MARK CURLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.
Jay Cooper, et al v. City of Plano, et al
as 15-40672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY SANDON COOPER and TERESA WARD COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PLANO, THOMAS MUEHLENBECK, City Manager, City of Plano, MARK ISRAELSON, Assistant City Manager, City of Plano and others
Brian Lewis v. Baton Rouge Police Department, et al
as 15-30171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Linda Hart v. EPA, et al
as 14-11228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA J. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, PRESIDENT OBAMA, FROST BANK and others
Michael Habiniak v. Mario Ramirez, Jr., et al
as 14-41060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HABINIAK
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIO E. RAMIREZ, JR., Judge, C. WESLEY KITTLEMAN, Attorney, CARLOS YZAGUIRRE, Attorney and others
Stephen Avdeef v. Royal Bank of Scotland, P.L.C., et al
as 14-11039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN M. AVDEEF
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND, P.L.C., ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND CITIZENS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JOHN P. CHUPP and others
Tryshatel McCardell v. HUD, et al
as 14-40955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRYSHATEL MCCARDELL, also known as Trysha McCardell
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
