Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Milteer v. Navarro County, Texas
as 23-10872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rick Milteer
Defendant / Appellee:
Navarro County, Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jim Navarro v. USA, et al
as 17-10468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Ruben Navarro, et al v. City of San Juan Texas, et al
as 14-41410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN NAVARRO, GLORIA MARTINEZ, YOLANDA ALVARADO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JUAN TEXAS and RODOLFO LUNA, Sgt., In his Individual Capacity and In his Official Capacity as a Police Officer and Agent of the City of San Juan
Fannie Garcia v. City of Laredo, Texas, et al
as 11-41118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FANNIE GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAREDO TEXAS, A Home Rule City, CARLOS MALDONADO, Chief of the City of Laredo, TX Police Department, Individually, and in his Official Capacity, CYNTHIA COLLAZO, Deputy City Manager of the City of Laredo, TX , Individually and in Her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-50832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shabazz v. Newsom, et al
as 08-20324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMED S SHABAZZ, also known as Clarence M Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A NEWSOM, ANNE SEARS, MUNSTERI SPROTT RIGBY NEWSOM AND ROBBINS PC and others
Naill, et al v. Benavides, et al
as 06-41539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON E NAILL, and others similarly situated females and JOHN E. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CESAR BENAVIDES, RODRIGO RUIZ, BETTY FLORES, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mayor for the City of Laredo and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
