Cases 101 - 110 of 390
John Ramirez v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70020
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN H. RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Charles Lopez v. Sharon Rowie Phillips, et al
as 15-20309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON Y. ROWIE PHILLIPS, Correctional Officer IV, John M. Wynne Unit, PRESION H. GAJAN, JR., Investigator, John M. Wynne Unit, KELLY L. STRONG, Senior Warden, John M. Wynne Unit and others
USA v. Lorenzo Aguilar
as 15-50415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LORENZO H. AGUILAR
James Gentry v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40588
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. GENTRY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Gentry v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40587
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES H. GENTRY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Norman Sanders v. Burl Cain, et al
as 15-30365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
N. BURL CAIN, CATHY FONTENOT, LESLIE DUPONT and others
Kirk Davis v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-40449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, OWEN MURRAY, ROGER PAWELEK and others
Daniel Almonte v. H. Vasquez
as 15-40192
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ALMONTE
Respondent - Appellee:
H. VASQUEZ, Warden
Jose Arreola-Amaya v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-40116
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE SALOMON ARREOLA-AMAYA
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Charles Zenon v. H. Vasquez
as 15-40098
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES R. ZENON
Respondent - Appellee:
H. VASQUEZ, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
