Cases 11 - 20 of 157
David Gray v. Phil Bryant, et al
as 18-60617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BRYANT, Governor, State of Mississippi, JIM HOOD, Attorney General, State of Mississippi, BRIAN RICHARDSON, Mississippi Bureau of Investigations and others
David Sanders v. Itawamba County, et al
as 18-60609
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
ITAWAMBA COUNTY, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and M.D.O.C.
Latitus Jones v. Norris Hogan, et al
as 18-60246
Petitioner - Appellant:
LATITUS JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
NORRIS HOGAN and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Detrick Harris v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 17-60855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETRICK DEWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and others
Anthony Strong v. United States, et al
as 17-60402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, SHERIFF CESAR CANTRELL and MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Daniel Wood v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 17-60311
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL NATHAN WOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, JUDGE GERALD CHATHAM, In official and individual capacity, ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES M. HOOD, III, In official and individual capacity and others
J. Higginbotham v. State of Mississippi
as 17-60194
Petitioner - Appellant:
J. C. HIGGINBOTHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Charleston Hudson v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 17-60190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLESTON HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ROBERT W. ELLIOTT, KELLY LUTHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-60815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Scruggs v. Timothy Outlaw, et al
as 16-60807
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT S. SCRUGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Warden and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
