Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Dickson v. Garland
as 22-60503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan K. Dickson
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, William Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Colette S. Peters, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Looper v. Jones
as 22-40579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delores Looper
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas B. Jones, Federal Bureau of Prisons and 6 Unknown Employees
Ellis v. USA
as 22-10729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Michael Caravajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Banks v. Fed Bureau of Prisons
as 22-30349
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Respondent / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Sekou Ma'at
Orr v. USA
as 22-30300
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Terry Colley v. Dr. Dandan, et al
as 18-30832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY J. COLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DANDAN, ZITA GUERRERO, WILLIE VASQUEZ and others
Melvin Wiand v. U.S. DOJ Fed Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 18-10701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN WIAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES RESERVE COMPLEX
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Administrator Federal BOP, et al
as 18-10475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIEF MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS UNITED STATES
Cecil Davis v. USA, et al
as 18-30399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, M. D. CARVAJAL, Warden, USP Pollock and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
