Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Charles Hadley v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RON KING, Superintendent, South Mississippi Correction Institution, APRIL MEGGS, Medical Director, South Mississippi Correctional Institution and others
Bobby Clemons v. Ron King, et al
as 10-60345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY TYRESE CLEMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, RON WOODALL, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and others
Delmar Shelby v. April Meggs, et al
as 10-60321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMAR EARL SHELBY
Defendant - Appellee:
APRIL MEGGS, Manager, MIKE HATTEN, Health Services Administrator, HARDY, Doctor, Dentist and others
Theodore Flanagan v. Billy Edwards, et al
as 10-40220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE FLANAGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY EDWARDS, individual and official capacity, APRIL COLLINS, individual and official capacity, LACRESHA LEWIS, Correctional Officer II, individual and official capacity and others
Joe Randle, Jr. v. Wesley Pratt, et al
as 10-40145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RICHARD RANDLE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY PRATT, LYNWOOD COOK, JAMES DANHIEN and others
Troy Perkins v. Andrew Chatham, et al
as 10-10100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW M CHATHAM, 282nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County Texas, 282ND DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF THE COURT, Unnamed-Unknown and APRIL SMITH
April Carver v. W. Elaine Chapman, Warden, et al
as 09-10646
Petitioner - Appellant:
APRIL DAWN CARVER
Respondent - Appellee:
W ELAINE CHAPMAN, Warden, Federal Medical Center Carswell and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Sylvester Branch v. Kentrell Liddell, et al
as 09-60176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER LEE BRANCH
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTRELL LIDDELL, Medical Director/GP and APRIL MEGGS, Site Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
