Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 519
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-10287
Petitioner / Appellant: Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, R. Bowers, Sr Warden, NFN Wonders and others
Jones v. Hooper
as 23-30140
Petitioner / Appellant: Marion Dale Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Jones v. Cain
as 23-60119
Petitioner / Appellant: Brett Alexander Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Jones v. Bickham
as 23-30105
Petitioner / Appellant: Reginald Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute, also known as Dusty Bickham
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-20045
Petitioner / Appellant: Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jones v. Beddingfields
as 23-40054
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brunzwick Lakeith Jones
Defendant / Appellee: Brad Beddingfields, Botie Hillhouse and Henderson County Sheriff's Office
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant: Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee: Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
Bonds v. Jones
as 23-30025
Plaintiff / Appellant: Anthony Bonds
Defendant / Appellee: Sherman Jones, in his individual capacity, Justin Barnes, in his individual capacity and Bayou Correctional Management Company, L.L.C.
USA v. Jones
as 22-60648
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Mark Randall Jones
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 22-11103
Petitioner / Appellant: Marcus DeAngelo Jones
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?