Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 267
McKnight v. Janssen Biotech
as 22-30162
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eugene Darryl McKnight
Defendant / Appellee: Janssen Biotech, Johnson & Johnson, Randy Smith, Sheriff and others
Stanton v. Ekeke
as 22-40168
Plaintiff / Appellant: Luke Adam Stanton, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: Grace N. Ekeke, Stephanie A. Lute, April Clark and others
Hurdsman v. Lumpkin
as 22-10280
Petitioner / Appellant: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10258
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 22-40068
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Unknown Defoor, Anthony Gordon and others
Adams v. Beusch
as 22-40054
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee: Unknown Beusch, Sergeant, Unknown Boykin, Sergeant, Unknown Blair, Sergeant and others
Davis v. Maginnis
as 22-20011
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael William Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: Patty Maginnis, Judge, Adam McLane, District Attorney, Sophia Korndorffer, Attorney and others
Roe v. Johnson County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-10890
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Roe
Defendant / Appellee: Johnson County, Southwestern Correctional, L.L.C., doing business as LaSalle Corrections, L.L.C., doing business as Lasalle Southwest Corrections, LaSalle Management Company, L.L.C. and others
Kenneth Adams v. Keith Deville, Warden
as 18-30959
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH DEVILLE, WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kamond Adams v. Michael Miller, et al
as 18-11097
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAMOND K. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL R. MILLER, Deputy Warden, WARDEN EDWARD PHARR, JR., CODY R. PARKER, Unit Major and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?