Cases 1 - 10 of 26
USA v. Ochoa-Orozco
as 23-40645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos Alberto Ochoa-Orozco
Johnson v. Rosenthal
as 23-20105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Lee Rosenthal, United States District Judge, Keith Ellison, United States District Judge, Lynn Hughes, United States District Judge and others
Shafer v. Muro
as 22-40594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Scott Shafer
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Javier Muro and Sergeant Nestor S. Ochoa
Abel Ochoa v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70016
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABEL REVILL OCHOA
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Osvaldo Vasquez-Ochoa
as 17-50173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OSVALDO VASQUEZ-OCHOA
USA v. Aurelia Hernandez
as 17-50075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AURELIA OCHOA HERNANDEZ, also known as Rachael Tovar, also known as Aurelia Hernandez
USA v. Edward Ochoa
as 16-40779
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD GENE OCHOA
Reynaldo Flores v. TDCJ Transitorial Plng Dept, et al
as 16-40409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REYNALDO FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRANSITORIAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN REGION INSTITUTIONS DIVISION ET AL, MAYRA RUBIO SANCHEZ, EDWARD GARCIA and others
USA v. Abraham Macias-Ochoa
as 15-11089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ABRAHAM MACIAS-OCHOA
Reynaldo Flores v. TDCJ Transitorial Plng Dept, et al
as 15-41340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REYNALDO FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRANSITORIAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN REGION INSTITUTIONS DIVISION ET AL, MAYRA RUBIO SANCHEZ, EDWARD GARCIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
