Cases 1 - 10 of 30
USA v. Casel
as 24-10360
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cecil Charles Casel, also known as CC
Beals v. Hooper
as 23-30628
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cecil Beals
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Max-George v. Oath
as 23-40253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecil Walter Max-George, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Oath, Incorporated, also known as Yahoo!, Incorporated and Verizon Communications, Incorporated
Max-George v. Equifax
as 22-40769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecil Walter Max-George
Defendant / Appellee:
Equifax Information Services, L.L.C.
Armstrong v. Lumpkin
as 22-50677
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kendric Cecil Armstrong
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Max-George v. Lumpkin
as 22-20288
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cecil Max-George, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cecil Max-George v. Honorable Justices of the Ct, et al
as 18-20507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MAX-GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, In their official capacity and JUDGE SUSAN BROWN, 185th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in her official capacity
Cecil Max-George v. Houston Police Department, et al
as 18-20260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MAX-GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER C. A. MYRICK, OFFICER D. W. DUVAL and others
Cecil Davis v. USA, et al
as 18-30399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, M. D. CARVAJAL, Warden, USP Pollock and others
Cecil Russell v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-10371
Petitioner - Appellant:
CECIL LEE RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
