Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Holloway v. Shaw
as 22-60101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Holloway
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Frank Shaw, Management & Training Corporporation, Individual capacity and Official capacity, Warden of Security N. Hogans, Management & Training Corporporation, Individual capacity and Official capacity, Jane Does 1-100, Management & Training Corporporation, Individual capacity and Official capacity and others
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA) and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100
Sheldon Nathan v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 16-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON NATHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and JOHN & JANE DOES 1-100
Jaime Garcia-Ontiveros v. K. Dixon, et al
as 14-11295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME GARCIA-ONTIVEROS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. DIXON, Warden, H. BRYAN, Associate Warden and DALBY HEALTH SERVICE DOE 1-100
Sacramento Perez v. Dalby Health Service, et al
as 14-11137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SACRAMENTO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DALBY HEALTH SERVICE, QUINTANA, Dalby Health Cordinator, KERRY DIXON, Warden and others
Jose Padilla v. USA, et al
as 14-40607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RUBEN ARGUETA PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLACY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and DOE 1-100
Fernando Sanchez Cortez v. Beeville County Jail, et al
as 14-40356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO JAVIER SANCHEZ CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BEEVILLE COUNTY JAIL, INSTITUTIONAL HEALTH SERVICE and DOES 1-100
Iparco Mazariegos v. Giles W. Dalby Corrtl Facil, et al
as 13-10065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IPARCO SANDOVAL MAZARIEGOS
Defendant - Appellee:
GILES W. DALBY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, HEALTH SERVICE OF GILES W. DALBY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and UNKNOWN DOE 1-100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
