Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Babu Kalluvilayil v. Classification Headquarters, et al
as 15-10454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABU S. KALLUVILAYIL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSIFICATION HEADQUARTERS, EDDY WHEELER, Warden, R. LEAL, Assistant Warden and others
Jonathan Peake v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20622
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN PEAKE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, et al
as 14-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN FNU WHEELER, WARDEN FNU BETCHER and others
USA v. Exdonovan Peak
as 14-60336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EXDONOVAN PEAK
Robert Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-10473
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Clarence William Griffin
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FNU FRITH, Officer, FNU O'CONER, Sergeant and others
Richard Coe, et al v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., et al
as 11-41003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD C. COE, BARBARA ANNE COE, DOUGLAS COE, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-30757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reese Baker, et al v. David Peake, et al
as 11-20332
Debtor:
In the Matter of: CRAIG WARREN FERNANDEZ, I
Appellant:
REESE WALKER BAKER and BAKER & ASSOCIATES
Appellee:
DAVID G PEAKE, Chapter 13 Trustee and AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY
L&C Consultants v. Ash Petroleum, et al
as 09-11096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
L&C CONSULTANTS
Defendant - Appellant:
ASH PETROLEUM, JAMES W. PEAK and GENE H. IRWIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
