Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Michael Crosby v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 14-31222
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Lloyd's Syndicate 1861, et al v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
as 14-30888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 1861 and D&B BOAT RENTALS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
CROSBY TUGS, L.L.C.
Dennis Applegate v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 14-20370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS APPLEGATE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MONTY HUDSPETH, OFFICER UNKNOWN TYLER and OFFICER UNKNOWN CROSBY
Michael Crosby v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 13-31255
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
State of Louisiana v. American Natl Prop & Cslty Co., et al
as 13-90061
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of insured(s)/assignor(s)/subrogor(s) Tommy Crosby and Milan Crosby
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN NATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and ANPAC LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY
Michael Crosby v. Bing Crosby, et al
as 11-31187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
BING CROSBY, MARY CROSBY, MONTY FORBESS and others
Marlon Crosby v. Christina Crain, et al
as 11-51098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON JERMAINE CROSBY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINA MELTON CRAIN, in her Official Capacity as Chairman of Texas Board of Criminal Justice, BRYAN COLLIER, in his Official Capacity as Director of Texas Board of Criminal Justice, STUART JENKINS, in his Official Capacity as Director of Parole Division Texas Board of Criminal Justice and others
Michael Crosby v. Chad Menzena, et al
as 11-31055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD MENZENA, MARY CROSBY, BING CROSBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
