Cases 21 - 30 of 107
USA v. Jerry Curry
as 19-11027
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY CURRY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marco Wright v. Harold Taylor, et al
as 19-60556
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN HAROLD TAYLOR, SERGEANT CURRY, R. PENNINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCO WRIGHT
Robin Mayfield, et al v. Butler Snow, L.L.P.
as 19-60331
Defendant / Appellant:
VICKIE CURRIE, Individually and in her Official Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MAYFIELD, ROBIN MAYFIELD, OWEN MAYFIELD and others
Brandon Richardson v. Brandon Belote, et al
as 19-40282
Defendant / Appellee:
THADDEUS HUNT, SAQUED SALINAS, BRANDON BELOTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON RICHARDSON
Carson Green v. Lasalle Corporation, et al
as 19-30020
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN JORDAN, BILLY TIGNER, LASALLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARSON GREEN
Jesse Curry, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20354
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE RANDOLPH CURRY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James Steele v. Joseph Curry, et al
as 17-20741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH CURRY, Medical Department and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Malcolm Melvin v. David Garnica
as 17-41032
Defendant / Appellee:
David Garnica, Steven Curry, Bryan LaCour and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Malcolm Melvin
Malcolm Melvin v. David Garnica, et al
as 17-41032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM MELVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GARNICA, STEVEN CURRY, DENNIS HILL and others
Brenda Curry v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 17-40890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENDA D. CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders CWABS, Incorporated, Assett-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
