Cases 51 - 60 of 131
Miguel Bacilio v. Blake Burns, et al
as 16-10037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL BACILIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE BURNS, Plaintiff's Attorney, MICHELLE HARTMAN, Assistant District Attorney, ELIZABETH BEACH, District Judge and others
Travis Arnold v. Russell Eliason, et al
as 15-30943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Travis Arnold v. Treadway, et al
as 15-30946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
TREADWAY, M. D. CARVAJAL, DOUZART and others
Travis Arnold v. Combs, et al
as 15-30942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Leland Howard v. Kurt Doyle
as 15-10952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LELAND HOWARD
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM BURNS
Kenneth Fairley, Sr., et al v. Hattiesburg Mississippi, et al
as 15-60637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REVEREND KENNETH E. FAIRLEY, SR., REVEREND D. FRANKLIN BROWNE, DENNIS D. HENDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI, HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, HATTIESBURG MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
USA v. William Burns, II
as 15-50868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES BURNS, II
Delvin Simmons v. Dallas Police Department, et al
as 15-10705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELVIN BERNARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER SCOTT MATTHEW JAY, OFFICER JEREMY SMITH, OFFICER PAULO BETANCOURT, #9212, Individually and in his official capacity and others
USA v. Kevin Burn
as 15-10463
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN BURNS
Helen Burns v. James Rogers, Warden
as 14-31264
Petitioner - Appellant:
HELEN BURNS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
