Cases 61 - 70 of 349
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Administrator Federal BOP, et al
as 18-10475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIEF MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS UNITED STATES
Cecil Davis v. USA, et al
as 18-30399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL MCDONALD DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, M. D. CARVAJAL, Warden, USP Pollock and others
D'Angelo Nunez v. USA, et al
as 18-40197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'ANGELO NUNEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Detrick Harris v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 17-60855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETRICK DEWAYNE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and others
Carl Chester v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 17-41044
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL CHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES SAMUELS, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and F. LARA, Warden, USP Beaumont
Carl Chester v. Mark Inch, et al
as 17-41036
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL CHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK S. INCH, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, F. LARA, Warden United States Penitentiary Beaumont and UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY BEAUMONT
Hector Valdez v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-50862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR A. VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DONNA MARCH, LAUREL OUTWIN and others
Jorge Briones v. Bureau of Prison
as 17-30409
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE BRIONES
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
John Rutoskey v. D. Harmon, et al
as 17-10527
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN MITCHELL RUTOSKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
D. J. HARMON, Warden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, State of Texas
Isaac Jones v. Warden Federal Bur of Prison, et al
as 17-30309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC REEVES JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON, T. SHOW, CAPTAIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
