Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Diana Rucker v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 15-10373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANA RUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., As Successor By Merger To BAC Home Loans Servicing LP As Successor To Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., As Trustee for the Certificate Holder of Park Place Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2005-WCW2
David Thompson, et al v. Bank of America N.A., et al
as 14-10560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID THOMPSON and TONI THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans and U.S. BANK N.A.
Richard Powell, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 14-40417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD POWELL and VICKIE POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and UNKNOWN PARTIES
Janine Charboneau v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 13-41237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANINE CHARBONEAU
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Lisa Sauers v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 13-51043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA A. SAUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., for the JP Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2006-A4
2832 Conrad Family Trust, et al v. Clifford Hayes, et al
as 13-10847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
2832 CONRAD FAMILY TRUST and DAVID M. WETHY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD HAYES, CLINT C. BURGESS, DAVID STOCKMAN and others
Timothy Tielke, et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 13-20425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY TIELKE and MELISSA ANN TIELKE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
