Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brown v. Davis
as 21-40088
Defendant / Appellee:
FMS II Terra Farris, Douglas Sparkman, FMS II Cooper Brasher and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vernard Brown, Jr.
Ash Bakre v. Sperry Steven, et al
as 17-40715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASH BABATUNDE BAKRE
Defendant - Appellee:
SPERRY STEVEN, SUSAN BISCOE and JOHN DOW
USA v. Luis Sensat
as 17-30452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS SENSAT, also known as Luis Sensat-Perdomo, also known as Machete, also known as Bisco
Robert Kramer v. Samuel Bisco, et al
as 11-40920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE KRAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL T. BISCO, Travis County Judge and AMALIA RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA, Travis County Distric Clerk
LeJonathan Cox v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 11-40763
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEJONATHAN E COX
Respondent - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, SHARON L. CARLILE and JANE DOE
Rodney Anderson v. Chuck Biscoe, et al
as 10-40650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY A. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, KEVIN SANDERS and STEPHEN HURT
Ronnie Barber v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 10-40495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE WAYNE BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHUCK BISCOE, Senior Warden, ROBERT HERRERA, Assistant Warden and others
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 09-40183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Newsome v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-41355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES NEWSOME
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CHUCK BISCOE, JOHN RHINEHART, Sergeant of Beto I Unit and others
Wiley v. Biscoe, et al
as 08-41336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHUCK BISCOE, DOROTHY BURNS, WARNER LUMPKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
