Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walker v. Robinson
as 20-61027
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarita Bivens, John Cooksey, Unknown Rankin County Jail Deputy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demario Walker
Travelers Indemnity Company, et al v. Forrest County, et al
as 17-60291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHEL MITCHELL, Executrix of the Estate of Phillip Bivens, ESTATE OF LARRY RUFFIN, ESTATE OF BOBBY RAY DIXON and others
James Ferguson v. Jarita Biven
as 16-60298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JARITA BIVENS, Mississippi Department of Corrections Assistant Director Offender Services
James Ferguson v. Jarita Biven
as 15-60791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JARITA BIVENS, Mississippi Department of Corrections Assistant Director Offender Services
USA v. Seth Biven
as 15-30416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SETH RYAN BIVENS
USA v. Seth Biven
as 14-31258
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SETH RYAN BIVENS
Daniel Corring v. SMCI Supervising Officials, et al
as 13-60846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GEORGE CORRING
Defendant - Appellee:
SMCI SUPERVISING OFFICIALS, Watch Commanders, Psychiatric Doctors, WARDEN, SUPERINTENDENT and others
Bivens, et al v. Union Pacific RR Co, et al
as 09-30011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTA ANDERSON, on behalf of DD, on behalf of AD, on behalf of DMV, As Next Friend and PSYRA BIVENS, on behalf of C A V, on behalf of Anthony D Vanzandt Estate, Individually and as Personal Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO, STEVEN BLACKBURN and JERRY GRANGER
Westerby v. Abbott, et al
as 08-40001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WESTERBY
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General, SMITH, Mark Stiles Unit, PITTMAN, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
