Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Dow
as 23-10305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Inga Dow, Keller Williams Realty, Incorporated, Gary Keller and others
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee:
Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
Acosta v. Denka Performance Elastomer
as 22-30570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David W. Acosta, Misty C. Acosta, Fabian Brimmer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Denka Performance Elastomer, L.L.C., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Dupont Performance Elastomers, L.L.C., formerly known as DuPont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C. and others
Dow Construction v. B P X Operating
as 22-30379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dow Construction, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
B P X Operating Company
Guidry v. Dow Chemical
as 22-90031
Petitioner:
Sheila Guidry, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ramona Alexander, Henry Holmes and others
Respondent:
Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation
Dow Construction v. B P X Operating
as 22-90028
Not Yet Classified:
Dow Construction, L.L.C. and B P X Operating Company
Butler v. E I DuPont de Nemours
as 22-30069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juanea L. Butler, Individually and as representative of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
E I DuPont de Nemours & Company, State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Health; Incorrectly named as Louisiana State Through the Department of Health and Hospitals and Dupont Performance Elastomers, L.L.C., formerly known as DuPont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.
USA v. Dow
as 21-51174
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Joseph Dow, also known as William Dow
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
