Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 23-50776
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tesla v. Louisiana Automobile Dealers
as 23-30480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tesla, Incorporated, Tesla Lease Trust and Tesla Finance, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Automobile Dealers Association, In itself and on behalf of its members, executive committee, and board of directors, Gregory Lala, In his official capacity as Chairman of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission, Allen O. Krake, In his Official capacity as a Commissioner of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission and his private capacity and others
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 23-50494
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Murray
as 23-40274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Keith Anthony Murray
USA v. Murray
as 23-10234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darrion Murray
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee:
Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
Calton v. Patel
as 22-40729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Fitzgerald Calton
Defendant / Appellee:
Pinkie Patel, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Health Administrator, Stiles Unit, Dale Wainwright, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice, FNU Eckersley, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Contract Dentist with UTMB/TDCJ and others
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 22-50797
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
