Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Franklin v. Regions Bank
as 23-30860
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fry Franklin and Cynthia Fry Peironnet
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Regions Bank v. Reggie
as 23-30636
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bradley, Allen & Stagg, L.L.C., doing business as Bradley Moreau Title
Defendant / Appellant:
Raymond C. Reggie
Cross Defendant:
Cadence Bank, previously identified incorrectly as BancCorpSouth Bank and Regions Bank
Ellis-Erkkila v. Citibank
as 23-50648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila, true name Priscilla Ann Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, BB&T Bank and others
Northern Frac Proppants v. Regions
as 22-30322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Northern Frac Proppants, L.L.C., Northern Frac Proppants, L.L.C., Series 1 and Northern Frac Proppants, L.L.C., Series 2
Defendant / Appellee:
Regions Bank, N.A.
Franklin v. Regions Bank
as 21-30324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eleanor Baugnies de St. Marceaux, Cynthia Fry Peironnet and Elizabeth Fry Franklin
Defendant / Appellee:
Regions Bank
Elizabeth Franklin, et al v. Regions Bank
as 19-30684
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIONS BANK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELEANOR BAUGNIES DE ST. MARCEAUX, CYNTHIA FRY PEIRONNET, SMALL FRY, L.L.C. and others
Chirag Patel v. Regions Bank, et al
as 19-30582
Defendant / Appellee:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, an Ohio corporation, TRANS UNION, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company and REGIONS BANK, an Alabama corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIRAG PATEL
Elizabeth Franklin, et al v. Regions Bank
as 18-90029
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ELIZABETH FRY FRANKLIN, SMALL FRY, L.L.C., CYNTHIA FRY PEIRONNET and others
Consolidated Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ELEANOR BAUGNIES DE ST. MARCEAUX
Defendant - Respondent:
REGIONS BANK
R. Ceasar v. Capital One Bank, et al
as 18-30736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, CHASE BANK, REGIONS BANK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
